Thank you for your reply. When we received our initial report, it showed a paleosink 3/4 the length of our property. Two out of the 3 drilling sights had extremely low blow counts, low N values, loss of drilling circulation at all 3 drilling area's, and several WOH indications. I had to repeatedly request copies of my GPR images. When I finally received them, they were incomplete, illedgible, on 11X 14 sheets of paper that were hand marked with thick black magic markers for reference points that were not ledgible as well. My engineering report also included a detailed grouting and injection diagram however, no reference was made to it in the report. When I spoke to the main geologist he said it was an error and should have never been there and he also verified that indeed, I had an 8 foot deep void in my front yard and that was normal. I challenged my insurance company about the report after I had 2 additional experts review the report. The insurance company finally sent it to another firm who also agreed that there was clear evidence of active sinkhole activity. The other experts I had review my report also discovered additional large anomolys that were never investigated from the original firm that did the report. I am still awaiting my repair estimate from the second firm that my insurance company hired for additional review. To the best of my knowledge, that is the only estimate I am to receive from them, unless I provide my own and I really do not know where to start on that issue as well. That is in summary, why I am so concerned.
|